Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Russell J. Berkowitz

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Deor (talk) 11:06, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Russell J. Berkowitz

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Vanity article about lawyer of doubtful notability. I suspect paid editing here, since somebody has repeatedly tried to create an article about the non-notable charitable organisation connected with his law firm. TheLongTone (talk) 16:15, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 16:24, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Everymorning talk 16:24, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: I don't see anything notable here. ubiquity (talk) 16:35, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – Membership in various professional organizations not enough for WP:ANYBIO. – Margin1522 (talk) 18:56, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per everyone above - Fails GNG. –Davey2010 ^{Merry Xmas / Happy New Year} 20:50, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Connecticut-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:14, 8 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Insufficient references from reliable sources to support notability. Borders on promotional. ^BE _CK ^Y _SA ^{Y L}E _S 09:32, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.